Hilarious skit by Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert for the Chicago Gridiron Show

where the mind goes

where the mind goes (Photo credit: sally garden)

Sponsored by the Chicago Headline Club, the Gridiron Show skewered local politics and media from 1987 to 1997.  A labor of love by a kooky bunch of journalists, pr peeps and politicians, it was also a benefit for student scholarships. This bit between Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert is laughing out loud funny. Writing is attributed to  Adam Ritt, with tweaks by the critics themselves. The video is out of synch but listen to the audience response.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Sally's World | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Choose News over Noise: McCormick’s Why News Matters wants your ideas by May 8

YouTube Preview Image

If ever there’s been a poster child for why news matters —and unfortunately why so often it doesn’t — it is the series of reporting events that began last week with the explosions at the finish line of the Boston Marathon and continue as I write.

In the rush to be first at each phase of the story,  we’ve seen all kinds of false and sloppy information polluting the already overcrowded news and information streams on Twitter, in newsprint and elsewhere. You can read  Gwen Ifill’s take on it:  When getting it first trumps getting it right as well as a Tweet loaded piece  by writer  for The Awl, where she called out several social journalism colleagues: Is your social media editor destroying your news organization? 

Farhad Manjoo of Slate weighed in with this sage advice in Breaking News is Broken:

When you first hear about a big story in progress, run to your television. Make sure it’s securely turned off.

Next, pull out your phone, delete your Twitter app, shut off your email, and perhaps cancel your service plan. Unplug your PC.

Now go outside and take a walk for an hour or two.

That sounds about right. That’s how bad it was.

If breaking news is broken, how do we fix it?

Journalists need to “have a filter between their ears and mouths — or eyes and keyboard,” as a colleague said on a private message board today. But the fact is all of us — not just journalists — must develop filters so we can cull the news from the noise and better understand events and issues.  To the degree that we’ve improved our ability to vet the quality of information that is presented to us, we’ll add value to the story when we make a contribution on the comments page, the Twitter feed or anywhere else on the social Web.

That’s one reason why the McCormick Foundation’s Why News Matters grant-making program is so badly needed.

How do we learn to choose news over noise?

Why News Matters seeks to heighten news literacy skills in the Chicago area and beyond.  The foundation will be investing as much as $6 million in promising innovative ideas that could make a difference in our ability to think critically about the information we are swimming in as well as distributing.

What’s news literacy?

It’s the set of critical thinking skills that enable citizens to judge the reliability and credibility of news reports and information sources.

McCormick says news literacy programs provide:

  • A frame of reference to distinguish fact from fiction, opinion or propaganda

  • An understanding of the First Amendement, the role of a free, independent media and the importance of journalistic values

  • A curiosity to seek information and better understand communities, national and international affairs

  • Help in navigating the myriad sources of digital information in a more skeptical and informed manner

  • A foundation for exercising civility, respect and car ein the exchange of information

Here’s some news literacy initiatives that McCormick has been funded to date.

Do you have an idea that could fit in? If so, get with your partners soon and write a Letter of Inquiry. Read McCormick’s FAQ. Do it soon.

Letters are due to McCormick by May 8.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Future of News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WordPress plugins for newsrooms revisited

NewsroomI had some great conversations with online publishers last year while I was working for the BlockbyBlock network. Many of them used these WordPress plugins for newsrooms.

Keep in mind that these tools create accountability, credibility and context for anything your site reports on, so they are valid for newsrooms of any type of organization, not just for what we think of as traditional newsrooms.

Here’s a few BxB posts on WP plugins that I refer to time and again.

Patricio G. Espinoza, who is a triple Fellow for Knight Digital, Poynter and McCormick, offered thoughts on WordPress plugins that include Contact forms, Biographies, Media Credits plus a tool to figure out what is slowing down your site.

Barb Iverson, digital thought leader, Journalism Professor at Chicago’s Columbia College, and editor and publisher of Chicagotalks.org recommended plugins for copy flow, extra content, embedding rich media and going mobile.

Thinking about creating a directory? Ned Berke, publisher of SheepsheadBites, and Clay Graham, founder of welocally.com, share their thoughts.

Are you asking your audience or members for funding but you’re not a non-profit?
Thoughts from small publishers on how to ask for support.

If I find any that need updating or uncover any new tools, I’ll be adding them here on SallyDuros.com.

Although the BxB network is no longer active, you can find publishers gathering at their new trade association, LION Publishers. They’ve put out a terrific new handbook for accuracy in reporting and attribution that you can download here.

Michele McLellan continues her groundbreaking work with indie online news publishers at Michele’s List, a fully searchable database that is sure to provide a treasure of information as it grows.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Future of News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do you write for free? Of course—kick some sand in my face!

 

Nate Thayer tells a riveting and comical story about his negotiations with The Atlantic over writing a story specifically for them, where the “They pay us with bylines” meme is taken to an absurd level. They ask him to write for free.

Read the email exchange and weep!

I’m not as accomplished as Nate Thayer but still I can share a story of my own.  It’s not exactly about journalism but it’s about what we journalists go through trying to make a living with our skills as communicators.

A few weeks back, I got an email from a recruiting firm about a “ghost” blogging job for the CEO of a high tech firm. I figured this was a small start-up company but I like those and said I was interested. I received a call from the young lady who breathlessly asked me to report for an interview with her agency, telling me “The company will probably want to hire you tomorrow!” I rearranged my schedule and went downtown and signed some endless paperwork presumably so the recruiters could present me to the client. In my conversation with the recruiters, I  learned the name of the company. It was a multi-billion dollar financial services company, and I knew a bit about their business having covered some of what they do while Real Estate Editor at the Chicago Sun-Times. I figured working for them was a bit like working for Satan but what’s a hungry journalist to do?

I figured they could afford to pay a decent hourly rate given their size. The recruiters seemed very excited about my credentials, and my potential with the client.

About one week later the recruiter called to say that the firm had found someone else to do the ghost blogging for them. “They found someone to do it pro bono,” she said, her voice quivering a little.

Hmm, I thought. That’s a tidy slap in the face.

I suspect forces at work here beyond just the simple monetary dynamics of the job. I learned that the person making the hiring decision had a very high level public affairs position and was undoubtedly familiar with my critical coverage of the greedy tactics endemic to the real estate bubble in the mid-oughts. That likely played into the company’s decision.  But that’s a connection the young recruiters would not have made.

So think about this the next time you meet an under-employed journalist. If she did a good job watchdogging her beat, the industry she reported on might not value her insight and talents. In fact, they might want to kick sand in her figurative face now that she is no longer protected by the legal and salary resources of a newsroom.  As much as the public needed to know the truth, that industry needed for her to shut up.

Truth is not necessarily the hallmark of public relations. And that’s what a good journalist does her best to deliver – the truth.

It’s just one of the many complexities journalists face when looking for work.

p.s. It was not bylined work, so they were not paying to access any of my journalistic “halo.” As a digital producer, I do help folks with marketing but not with my byline. You can’t pay me to say good things about you under my byline – which is solidly attached to my reputation as a journalist. Hire me full time and take me captive with a salary and benefits – well that’s another story.  Do you find this confusing? If so, let me know.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Future of News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Can trust pay for local news? Questions from TED ….

Embedly Powered

via TED

Ask. Connect. Be vulnerable. That’s what Amanda Palmer says fuels her musical earnings in this moving and persuasive Ted talk.

Is trust the currency that will pay for local news? Maybe the answer   depends on some key things.  Does your news come from the heart of your community? Does your audience value your work as much as you do?

If they do, maybe 1000 true fans is all you need. If not, how can you adjust to the needs of your audience?

Think about it — how has trust fueled your news site? How can you create more of it?

Or is Palmer’s talk another case of persuasive propaganda fueling a misty-eyed view of the Internet? News sites, you tell me. Are we just tilting at windmills here?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Future of News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can 1,000 true fans make a living for journalists?

YouTube Preview ImageJournalists and niche sites looking for a revenue model are just a peek around the corner from what looks like some workable answers. If you are conversing with your audience in a way that is relevant to them, and you ask them for support they will be there. That is if the principle of 1,000 true fans proves true for news as for other kinds of bloggers, curators and synthesizers.

Obviously, the power of passionate followers is not news to folks like Maria Popova and her Brain Pickings as Felix Salmon points out in his recent post for Reuters. And Andrew Sullivan, in a much reported move, recently went public with The Daily Dish. My colleagues in the indie news world are adding “Support Us” to their already heavy toolboxes, as I wrote here.  Even though much remains to be sorted out – including transparency about material connections between creators and the products they discuss – there’s hope in the air.

Read this article from Rolling Stone and then compare the loss of “advances” in the music industry with the loss of “salaries” in the journalism/news world. A lot of what these musicians have learned is what independent news sites and niche news sites are adopting with some success. It’s hard work but these musicians, just like the independent news world, are making a go of it with the support of their fans.

To make a living

Think about Kevin Kelly’s 1000 true fans from 2008

A creator, such as an artist, musician, photographer, craftsperson, performer, animator, designer, videomaker, or author – in other words, anyone producing works of art – needs to acquire only 1,000 True Fans to make a living.

That goes for journalism, and community news, too, which I am increasingly defining as community development work – it’s really about bringing people together over information that they crave to share about the amenities and issues in the places where they live. These places reside both on our blocks — our neighborhoods—  and in our hearts – the passions we share.

A living, not a killing

I predict [fingers crossed] when the dust settles, the online market will have defined for the first time the working wage for a writer, journalist, community developer  - those creatives who plumb the public mind to serve deep dish ideas tied to our places and our passions that tighten our ties with each other.

Thank you to Northwestern University Journalism professor Rachel Davis Mersey for pointing out this article. Mersey does a great talk on branding and audience engagement that was the highlight of my digital entrepreneurship training at the Poynter Institute. In it she describes important matters of civic importance as getting folks to eat their “vegetables.”

How to serve up vegetables – deliciously

“If we only give what people want, we will badly neglect what people need,” Mersey says in the video above. But, as journalists, “if I understand that audience well enough I can help that audience understand issues that are incredibly important,” she concludes. First thanks go to journalism undergrad Kelly Agon Salves. You’ve got it right, Kelly. Passion is the fuel.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Future of News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment